媒體英語
Australia’s ‘catastrophic’ fires continue 澳大利亞 “災(zāi)難級” 林火仍在燃燒
（注：原文發(fā)表于 2019 年 11 月 20 日）
高溫和大風(fēng)正在擴(kuò)大澳大利亞林火危機(jī)所威脅到的地區(qū)，澳大利亞的三個州已發(fā)出警告，預(yù)計將迎來今年林火季最糟糕的狀況。
Summer is still officially two weeks away, yet Australia has rarely - if ever - seen fires of such intensity. A ‘code red’ warning has been issued in the state of Victoria for the first time in almost a decade.
距離夏季正式到來還有兩周時間，然而澳大利亞幾乎從未遇到強(qiáng)度如此猛烈的火災(zāi)。維多利亞州近十年來首次發(fā)布 “紅色預(yù)警”。
In neighbouring South Australia, communities on the Yorke Peninsula, west of Adelaide, have witnessed voracious walls of flame. In New South Wales, six people have died in the fires in recent weeks and more than 600 homes have been destroyed.
在鄰近的南澳大利亞州，阿德萊德以西的約克半島上，當(dāng)?shù)厣鐓^(qū)燒起了彌天大火。在新南威爾士州，最近幾周已有六人死于火災(zāi)，600 多座房屋被燒毀。
Sydney has again been choked by a toxic smoky haze from nearby blazes. As the flames rage so does the debate about the impact of climate change.
悉尼再次被附近大火帶來的有毒煙霧所籠罩。隨著大火的肆虐，人們就氣候變化所造成的影響也展開了激烈的辯論。
The government here insists there is no direct evidence linking warmer, drier conditions to this Australian crisis. However, scientists and the nation's official weather bureau say the proof is there for all to see.
澳大利亞政府堅稱，沒有直接證據(jù)表明氣候變暖、干燥的天氣條件與這次澳洲林火危機(jī)有關(guān)。但科學(xué)家與澳大利亞的國家官方氣象局表示，證據(jù)是顯而易見的。
詞匯
intensity 強(qiáng)度，猛烈程度
code red 紅色預(yù)警
voracious （火勢）兇猛的
choked 被濃煙籠罩的，被煙霧充斥的
toxic 有毒的
rage （火勢或爭論）肆虐
climate change 氣候變化
proof 證據(jù)
閱讀理解：請在讀完上文后，回答下列問題。
1. How often has Australia seen such intense fires?
2. What is ‘choking’ Sydney and making it difficult for people there to breathe?
3. True or false? There are strong feelings and anger in the discussions about the impact of climate change.
4. Why does the Australian government think that the fires are not caused by climate change?
答案
1. How often has Australia seen such intense fires?
Hardly ever (rarely), or possibly never (if ever).
2. What is ‘choking’ Sydney and making it difficult for people there to breathe?
Sydney has again been choked by a toxic smoky haze from nearby blazes.
3. True or false? There are strong feelings and anger in the discussions about the impact of climate change.
True. As the flames rage so does the debate about the impact of climate change. (Rage can describe a strong feeling of anger.)
4. Why does the Australian government think that the fires are not caused by climate change?
The government insists there is no direct evidence linking warmer, drier conditions to this Australian crisis.
