鼓吹對(duì)華冷戰(zhàn)在美國(guó)從來(lái)就沒(méi)有停止過(guò)，在中國(guó)也有些人熱衷于跟風(fēng)吆喝。自從中國(guó)成為世界第二大經(jīng)濟(jì)體，美國(guó)一些政治精英鼓動(dòng)了一波又一波對(duì)華政策大辯論，集中的調(diào)門(mén)就是中美關(guān)系正?；詠?lái)美國(guó)所有的對(duì)華政策都失敗了，中國(guó)的改革開(kāi)放不但沒(méi)有達(dá)到美國(guó)預(yù)期的效果，反而隨著中國(guó)發(fā)展日益對(duì)美國(guó)的世界領(lǐng)導(dǎo)地位形成挑戰(zhàn)和威脅，中美關(guān)系已走到臨界點(diǎn)，應(yīng)該對(duì)中國(guó)采取規(guī)范、制約和遏制的措施了。特朗普當(dāng)選美國(guó)第45任總統(tǒng)，讓冷戰(zhàn)精英們感覺(jué)時(shí)機(jī)已到，于是他們大肆鼓吹中國(guó)已成為美國(guó)的頭號(hào)戰(zhàn)略競(jìng)爭(zhēng)對(duì)手。特朗普總統(tǒng)與這些政治精英相互影響、相互利用，一時(shí)間對(duì)華貿(mào)易熱戰(zhàn)和從戰(zhàn)略上遏制中國(guó)的冷戰(zhàn)喧囂，嚴(yán)重毒化了中美關(guān)系的正常氛圍。

There have been constant calls coming from the US for a cold war with China, and there are some people in China who are keen to engage it. Since China became the world's second largest economy, some of the US political elite have demanded a review of America's China policy. The crux of their argument is that the US's China policy since the normalization of relations has failed. Not only has China's reform and opening up policy not lived up to US expectations, but China is increasingly challenging US hegemony as it develops. China-US relations, therefore, have reached a critical point at which some in the US feel it must regulate, restrict and contain China. Trump's election to the White House was taken by the “cold war elite” that their time had come to play up China as the bogeyman of world peace and a threat to American interests. It also caters to Trump's zero sum mentality to global trade, ignoring the immense benefits China's low-cost consumer goods have benefitted not just millions of American consumers for decades, but the whole world at large. Their twisted view of world trade interconnectivity led them to a philosophical cul-de-sac - ie., that they must contain China, and to a lesser extent, other trading allies, with massive tariffs. Trump's sledgehammer approach to a purely trade issue has led to universal condemnation and resistance. The concern now is that this needless hostility might spread into other areas of bilateral relations.

美國(guó)對(duì)華貿(mào)易戰(zhàn)無(wú)法無(wú)理，損人害己，這已成為世人有言無(wú)言的共識(shí)。對(duì)貿(mào)易戰(zhàn)，中國(guó)不愿打，但也不怕打。中國(guó)已被迫堅(jiān)決回?fù)簟Ｈ绻菃渭兊馁Q(mào)易戰(zhàn)，相信雙方在殘酷的現(xiàn)實(shí)面前總會(huì)找到出路。問(wèn)題是，當(dāng)下中美間的沖撞已遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)超出人們的想象。

While China is an unwilling participant in this trade war, it will not run away from it either as shown by its retaliatory tariffs against American imports. The hope now is that the pain inflicted on both sides will force them to the negotiating table at some point. . The immediate problem is that this tit-for-tat has already gone beyond where people thought it would go and inflicted serious damage all around.

那么，中美之間會(huì)爆發(fā)新冷戰(zhàn)嗎？時(shí)下中美關(guān)系的政治氣氛很不正常，冷戰(zhàn)幽靈正四處游蕩，冷戰(zhàn)叫囂如山雨欲來(lái)，人們已聞到了冷戰(zhàn)的火藥味。在美國(guó)，一些在軍界、情報(bào)界有頭有臉的人物甚至玩起了無(wú)中生有、混淆是非、賊喊捉賊的把戲，聲稱(chēng)中國(guó)正在對(duì)美國(guó)發(fā)動(dòng)一場(chǎng)“無(wú)聲的冷戰(zhàn)”，正在傾全部資源努力取代美國(guó)?？瓷先ィ鼐壵蔚膹?qiáng)勢(shì)回歸，大國(guó)圍繞秩序主導(dǎo)權(quán)的博弈一定程度上構(gòu)成了新冷戰(zhàn)的基礎(chǔ)條件。然而，在大動(dòng)蕩、大變革、大調(diào)整的非（熱）戰(zhàn)時(shí)代，人類(lèi)社會(huì)的主要矛盾正在發(fā)生明顯變化，地緣政治矛盾正逐步讓位于日益深化的全球化與全球治理、國(guó)家治理滯后的矛盾。當(dāng)今世界經(jīng)濟(jì)融合與政治對(duì)話(huà)的時(shí)代主趨勢(shì)也在相當(dāng)程度上抑制著冷戰(zhàn)發(fā)酵。中美矛盾不是當(dāng)今國(guó)際社會(huì)的主要矛盾。只要中國(guó)不應(yīng)冷戰(zhàn)，中美冷戰(zhàn)就打不起來(lái)，但需時(shí)刻保持高度警惕，并努力化解之。

So, will there be a new Cold War between China and the US? The political atmosphere between the two countries is highly abnormal and incendiary, as the specter of the old Cold War looms and the smell of gunpowder pervades. Meanwhile, dignitaries in the US military and intelligence communities are fabricating stories and standing facts on their head by claiming that China is waging a silent cold war and mobilizing all its resources to usurp the US. It does appear, to some extent, that the return to geopolitical tension and jostling for position among the great powers has created the basic conditions for a new cold war. But what's most concerning are the warnings by some serious scholars that the rivalry between the two powers could be spiraling down towards the Thucydides Trap. Fortunately, this is not inevitable in view of the fast changing geo-political dynamics on the world stage, mostly favorable to China. Thanks to President Xi's bold actions, China is now viewed by many as the champion of free trade, sustainable development, efforts to counter climate change and world peace, having supplied the most number of troops to the United Nations Peacekeeping Force. The world community is not blind to China's benevolent influence, and how it uses its power for the greater good of humanity. With such a track record, it's hard to see China firing the first shot in a hot war.

傳統(tǒng)的冷戰(zhàn)，雙方關(guān)系的對(duì)抗性極強(qiáng)。冷戰(zhàn)雙方，尤其是首先挑起的一方，以攻擊對(duì)方制度、否定對(duì)方價(jià)值觀(guān)、詆毀對(duì)方影響、削弱對(duì)方力量、顛覆對(duì)方政權(quán)為出發(fā)點(diǎn)和最高目標(biāo)。美國(guó)借這些手段加速了前蘇聯(lián)的消亡和分裂。時(shí)代不同了，產(chǎn)生冷戰(zhàn)的諸因素中，制度的不同可以說(shuō)是形成對(duì)抗的最基本因素，但已不是唯一和決定性的。價(jià)值觀(guān)和利益也都可以說(shuō)與制度因素同等重要，但也都不是唯一的和決定性的。筆者以為，結(jié)合并高于以上三要素的“霸權(quán)謀取”、“霸權(quán)維護(hù)”和“霸凌主義”才是最根本的因素，是一切冷戰(zhàn)最基本的共性。這一看法或許也解釋了相同制度下、同一價(jià)值觀(guān)體系內(nèi)無(wú)法避免冷戰(zhàn)。特朗普總統(tǒng)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)下的美國(guó)似乎正在成為同一體系內(nèi)冷戰(zhàn)的肇始者和踐行者。

During the old Cold War, the relationship between the two camps was one of extreme antagonism. If one side was provoked, it would seek to attack the other's institutions, denounce its values, vilify its influence, weaken its strength and subvert its political power. These were methods used by the US to accelerate the demise of and divide the Soviet Union. Times have changed, however. Of the factors that cause cold wars, differences in institutions is one of the basic factors in creating confrontation, though that is not the only or decisive factor; different values and interests are on a par with institutional factors in terms of importance, but these are also not the only or decisive factors. Combined with and more important than these three factors is “seeking hegemony”, “hegemonic maintenance” and “hegemonic bullying”, which are the most basic factors and most fundamental commonalities of all cold wars. This view also explains why a cold war cannot even be avoided when countries operate within the same institutions and have the same value systems. It seems that under Trump's leadership, the US is becoming a pioneer and practitioner of cold war with countries within a common system.

中華五千年文明的精髓從來(lái)都是否定霸權(quán)的，新中國(guó)歷代領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人從來(lái)都是反對(duì)霸權(quán)的，反對(duì)霸權(quán)主義還明確而充分地體現(xiàn)在中國(guó)的憲法和政府政策中。中國(guó)十分厭惡和反對(duì)冷戰(zhàn)。美國(guó)就不好說(shuō)了，現(xiàn)代冷戰(zhàn)就是美國(guó)人發(fā)明的，這些人的基因中充滿(mǎn)了霸權(quán)思想和冷戰(zhàn)思維，他們一代代相傳。當(dāng)下美國(guó)國(guó)內(nèi)政治嚴(yán)重分化、異化，貧富鴻溝日益加深，“美國(guó)失敗”的焦慮也確實(shí)很難不讓政治精英們重拾祖宗遺留的冷戰(zhàn)魔杖。然而，與中國(guó)打冷戰(zhàn)，美國(guó)找錯(cuò)了對(duì)象。

A defining aspect of China's five-thousand-year-old civilization has been its rejection of hegemony. Indeed, the leaders of the People's Republic of China have always opposed hegemony, and this is clearly reflected in China's Constitution and its government policies. China hates and opposes cold wars. The US does not as can be seen in its history of foreign interventions. This modern cold war is an American invention. American genes carry on the hegemonic and old Cold War mentality. Domestic politics in the US is highly contentious, divided and divisive, and the gap between rich and poor is widening. Fear of failure in the US has inspired some to pick up the Cold War mantle left by their ancestors. But in targeting China, the US has picked the wrong adversary to wage its cold war.

傳統(tǒng)冷戰(zhàn)有一個(gè)明顯的特征，那就是以集團(tuán)政治和同盟價(jià)值觀(guān)為基礎(chǔ)。如今華約已不復(fù)存在，北約雖一時(shí)注入地緣活力，東擴(kuò)南下，但眼下離心傾向、甚至分裂現(xiàn)象嚴(yán)重。特朗普公開(kāi)聲稱(chēng)歐盟為“敵人”絕不是一時(shí)口誤，恰恰反映了傳統(tǒng)冷戰(zhàn)的精神支柱——東西方對(duì)抗的作用邊緣化的傾向。美國(guó)傳統(tǒng)冷戰(zhàn)同盟軍的美夢(mèng)恐難實(shí)現(xiàn)，勢(shì)力范圍論在當(dāng)今時(shí)代也只是癡人說(shuō)夢(mèng)。

A distinct feature of the old Cold War is that it was based on group politics and shared values. Nowadays, the Warsaw Pact no longer exists, and although NATO has gained geopolitical vitality as it has pushed eastward and southward, its centrifugal tendencies and fissions raise serious questions about its efficacy. Trump's public denunciation of the EU as an “enemy” was no slip of the tongue. Rather, it reflects a central pillar of the original Cold War: the marginalizing tendency of East-West tension. The US dream of rebuilding the old Cold War alliance will be difficult to achieve, and the US theory of spheres of influence is but a distant dream.

今天的社會(huì)已遠(yuǎn)不是喬治·凱南所在的那個(gè)年代，凡有點(diǎn)政治頭腦的人都會(huì)看到，全球化、信息化、產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈、價(jià)值鏈已成為不可阻擋的歷史發(fā)展潮流。冷戰(zhàn)與你中有我、我中有你的國(guó)際社會(huì)格格不入。有人想把當(dāng)前訛詐式的貿(mào)易戰(zhàn)以冷戰(zhàn)形式延續(xù)下去，這是與時(shí)代主旋律唱反調(diào)。任何國(guó)家的人民和企業(yè)都會(huì)站出來(lái)反對(duì)。技術(shù)封鎖也好，極限施壓也罷，強(qiáng)征關(guān)稅也好，挑起匯率戰(zhàn)也罷，對(duì)中國(guó)這樣已經(jīng)并將進(jìn)一步敞開(kāi)大門(mén)搞建設(shè)的國(guó)度都會(huì)變得毫無(wú)意義。

The era of George Kennan is long gone, and anyone with even a modicum of political savvy realizes that globalization, IT application, industry chains and value chains are irresistible historical trends. A cold war is incompatible with the inseparable nature of the international community or free market practices. Some people wish to continue the current extortionate trade war in the form of a cold war, which goes against the historical tide. The people and businesses of all countries oppose this. Technological blockades, extreme pressure, punitive tariffs and provoking a currency war will not work against a country such as China that has already opened and continues to open further its doors to the world.

筆者還想提醒那些熱衷于同中國(guó)打冷戰(zhàn)的人，在地緣經(jīng)濟(jì)和地緣安全問(wèn)題上，同美國(guó)一樣，中國(guó)同樣擁有自己廣闊的戰(zhàn)略縱深。在地緣戰(zhàn)略的總體環(huán)境上，當(dāng)今中國(guó)可能越來(lái)越比美國(guó)顯得更有優(yōu)勢(shì)。今年G7峰會(huì)和北約峰會(huì)上，特朗普總統(tǒng)忙不停地在內(nèi)部進(jìn)行“清理”、“算賬”，處處樹(shù)敵。中國(guó)奉行不結(jié)盟政策，但與世界許多國(guó)家已經(jīng)形成各有特色的合作伙伴關(guān)系，共謀發(fā)展。結(jié)伴同行，這是一股清新的歷史潮流。

I would remind those keen on fighting a cold war with China that, like the US, China has its own strategic maneuverability when it comes to geo-economic and geo-security issues. In terms of overall geopolitical strategy, China today has an increasingly clear advantage over the US. Although it appears that the US has many allies, at the G7 and NATO summits this year, Trump spent his time sorting out problems and settling scores, creating enemies everywhere he went. China, on the other hand, pursues a policy of nonalignment, but it enjoys special partnerships with many countries around the world. Working together toward common goals has thus become a new historical trend.

冷戰(zhàn)還有一條隱蔽的戰(zhàn)線(xiàn)，那就是搞和平演變，搞顏色革命，把變天的希望寄托在未來(lái)一代人身上。這一點(diǎn)，美國(guó)一些機(jī)構(gòu)早就打著各種旗號(hào)明里暗里在做了。中國(guó)也確有不少人崇拜美國(guó)。但這些絲毫影響不了自強(qiáng)不息的中華兒女，中國(guó)特色的社會(huì)主義市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)道路將越走越寬。中國(guó)特色社會(huì)主義理論和實(shí)踐讓億萬(wàn)民眾有了日益增多的獲得感和幸福感，這是一道牢不可破的新時(shí)代防火長(zhǎng)城，抵御著內(nèi)外各種不健康思潮的侵蝕。任何改變中國(guó)顏色和分裂中國(guó)的圖謀都不會(huì)得逞。

There is also a hidden front within the new cold war. That is, a group that wishes to see China evolve peacefully and for it to change its political persuasion. For this, they pin their hopes on the future generations. There are indeed some people in China who worship the US, but they have limited influence on the Chinese people who still believe in constantly striving for self-improvement. It is simply that the path of the socialist market economy with Chinese characteristics is getting wider acceptance because, as they say, the proof of the pudding is in the eating. The idea of serving the country has been ingrained in its people, because the notion of noblesse oblige was part of the ethic of Chinese people since Confucian times. The successful implementation of socialism with Chinese characteristics has instilled in the Chinese people with great pride and gratitude for the untold benefits it brought them. This has created an impenetrable, albeit intangible, new Great Wall around China that is capable of resisting the erosion of unhealthy thoughts generated inside and outside China. Any attempt to change China's political system or divide the country will inevitably fail.

中國(guó)將集中精力、堅(jiān)定不移地做好自己的事，推動(dòng)構(gòu)建新型國(guó)際關(guān)系，打造人類(lèi)命運(yùn)共同體，堅(jiān)決反對(duì)和努力避免冷戰(zhàn)。這些將成為中國(guó)在處理國(guó)際關(guān)系中的最高境界。

China will determinedly and unswervingly stick to its chosen path to success. It will continue to expand its cordial international relations with a view to creating a harmonious global community with a shared future, and resolutely opposing and working hard to avoid a cold war.

作者：陳永龍，中國(guó)國(guó)際問(wèn)題研究基金會(huì)美國(guó)研究中心主任

（來(lái)源：中美聚焦網(wǎng)，編輯：Helen）